Kinds: The death blow of evolution!


     Evolution states that from one single cell organism stemmed every living thing that exists today by a process of natural selection (that is Darwin’s theory anyway). He likened the process, in his famous book ‘Origin of Species’, to a tree in which the first simple organisms are the stump and then slowly branch off into different species-or branches-in order to adapt into different environments. The problem is that this is not scientific by any means. Science is defined as something we can observe and come to a conclusion of, but evolution asks us to deny that and blindly believe in a theory which Darwin himself said was flawed. Let’s begin the deconstruction.
     First off, adaptation is NOT evolution. The fact that animals can be cross bred to breed different species of the same kind, does not prove evolution because a different bird is still a bird. A different bacteria is still a bacteria. If evolution were true then there should be evidence of some kind of transition from kind to different kind, but we have no evidence of such.
     Secondly, evolution defies biology and laws of nature such as thermodynamics. More specifically the second law of thermodynamics which, in a nutshell, states that molecules are moving from order to a state of chaos. This is a LAW of nature that stands in all cases, but evolution contradicts this law claiming biology is growing more complex. More intricate.
     Lastly, in Genesis the Bible mentions “kinds” ten times in the first chapter alone. God created creatures of the air according to their own “kind,” creatures of the sea according to their own “kind,” etc. And it it’s this biblical definition of “kind” that puts the knife through the heart of evolution. This means dogs will always be dogs, cats will always be cats, gorillas will always be gorillas, and humans will always be human. Over the ages man has subcategorized God’s division of animal kinds into species, but that is not what God says here. Kinds are not different species of dogs such as great danes, chihuahuas, poodles, etc., but dogs as a whole.
     Science is defined as something we can observe and come to a conclusion of, but evolution asks us to deny that and blindly believe in a theory which Darwin himself said was flawed. If you ask a biological scientist (one whom specializes in evolutionary biology preferably) if we can observe evolution in any way shape our form they will probably try to jargon their way out of answering, but the ultimate answer is no, we can not.

     ” In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”
                   -Genesis 1:1



Filed under Apologetics, Christianity, Evolution, Religion, Truth

5 responses to “Kinds: The death blow of evolution!

  1. This is a very good take on showing that evolution just isn’t all that believers try so hard to make it so believable. by the way, thank you for following my blog. God Bless!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Evolutionists always change words meanings to not be boxed in to a dead end. Now they say there will say there are no Kinds and talk about other definitions and some deny macroevoultion is even a word. That want to keep their cosmology so they invent ways to keep their belief alive despite the facts to the contrary

    Liked by 1 person

    • I couldn’t have said it better myself. They seem to completely–intentionally it seems–neglect the “Cambrian explosion”. There is absolutely no evidence of middle stages. All evidence points to intelligent design. God bless.


  3. Scientific evidence that evolution is impossible ::

    In the 1990s, the science of information theory came into prominence, but it still has not uncovered a natural source for the huge mass of specific information found within the genome, the DNA blueprint of living things.

    Definition Domain:
    All 5 levels of information are found
    statistics, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, apobetics

    The scientic laws of information govern this domain and because we have these scientifc laws …

    STRONG CONCLUSIONS can be drawn !
    1) Since the DNA code of all life forms is clearly within the definition domain of information, we conclude there must be a sender

    2) Since the density and complexity of the DNA encoded information is billions of times greater than man’s present technology, we conclude the Sender must be supremely intelligent!

    1. There must be a sender
    2. The sender is omnisicient (infinite in telligence and information)
    3. The sender is omnipotent
    4. The sender is eternal

    3) Since the Sender must have:
    _ encoded (stored) the information into the DNA molecules,
    _ contructed the molecular biomachines required for the encoding,
    decoding & synthesizing processes and,
    _ designed all the features for the original life forms
    the Sender must be purposeful and supremely powerful!

    Where did the Sender’s information & creative power originate?

    There are two(2) possibilites:
    1. A regression of senders extending back to a Sender possessing
    infinite information, intelligence and power, or
    2. One eternal sender with infinite information, intelligence
    and power (omniscient & omnipotent).

    4) Since information is a non-material fundamental entity and cannot originate from material quantities, we conclude that the sender must have a non-material component (spirit)

    Five conclusions about the sender:
    1. There must be a sender.
    2. The sender must be omniscient (infinite in intelligence and information).
    3. The sender must be omnipotent (almighty).
    4. The sender must be eternal.
    5. The sender must have at least, a non-material component.

    We can now take these conclusions and see if the Bible is correct.
    Comparisions with the Bible:
    1. The fool says in his heart there is no God (Ps 14:1)
    2. Now we can see that you know all things (Jn 16:30)
    3. I am the Alpha and the Omega, … who is and who was, and who
    is to come, the Almighty (Rev 1:8)
    4. From everlasting to everlasting you are God (Ps 90:2)
    5. God is spirit (Jn 4:24)

    Who is the sender (creator)?
    _ Genesis 1 “and God said” – ten times
    _ Psalm 33:9 “For He spoke and it came to be. He commanded and
    it stood firm”
    _ John 1:1-3 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
    and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All
    things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
    was made.” If you read further in the book of John you find that this
    person is no other than the Lord Jesus Christ who is the Creator.

    5) Since information is a non-material fundamental entity and cannot originate from material quantities, and since information also originates from man, we conclude man’s nature must have a non-material component (spirit)

    How about an answer to the Big Bang
    6) Since information is non-material entity, we conclude that the assumption “the universe is composed solely of mass and energy” is false!

    7) Since:
    1) biological information originates only from an intelligent sender and,
    2) all theories of chemical and biological evolution require that information
    must originate solely from mass and energy alone (no sender)

    we conclude all theories or concepts of chemical and biological evolution are false!
    Evolution is impossible and we can say it from the highest level of science and the view points from the Laws of Nature about information.

    Anyone who disagrees with these laws and conclusions must falsify them by demonstrating the initial origin of information from purely material sources!

    Therefore, the laws of nature about information have:
    1. Refuted the assumptions of scientific materalism and the theories of chemical and biological evolution.
    2. Established the existence of an eternal, omniscient, omnipotent Being.

    All philosophies or theories based on the assumpiton of scientific materialism including chemical and biological evolution are falsified by the Laws of Nature about information.

    For more information on Information Theory ::

    One of the world’s leading information scientists, Dr Werner Gitt from Germany’s Federal Institute of Physics and Technology in Braunschweig, says, ‘There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this.’ His challenge to scientifically falsify this statement has remained unanswered since first published. Even those mutations which give a survival benefit are seen to be losses of information, not creating the sorely needed new material upon which natural selection can then go to work.

    The revolt against Darwinism (


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s